Showing posts with label Traditional Media. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Traditional Media. Show all posts

Wednesday, February 4, 2015

Hooray, Chelsea Clinton!


Chelsea Clinton

Apparently the hiring of a certain first daughter as correspondent has ruffled feathers among professional journalists, as the Los Angeles Times reports in Chelsea Clinton on NBC: When media hire from political families.  Was she hired on merit or as gimmick? Perhaps both. She’s got the tools that the profession looks for: smart, articulate and educated. Then why not take advantage of her household name and face? If she in fact can parlay her talent into genuine, on-the-spot performance, then congratulations to NBC for a bold move and hooray for Clinton!

Moreover, consider this from the Times:
Judy Muller, a one-time ABC correspondent who now teaches at USC‘s Annenberg School for Communication, said it is hard not to see the Clinton hiring as a “gimmick.” She said it would be hard to explain to her students that it sometimes takes more than hard work and persistence to make it to national television.
The US of course was built on the democratic ideals of fairness, justice and equality. Yes, its systems, processes and culture do their level best to realize these ideals. But in actual practice, our day to day life is not always fair or just. In fact, we’re not even all that equal when it comes to talent and opportunities. So, largely by accident and somewhat by design, Clinton happened to be born into and live a life within a famous household. Then she could maximize all that she had at her disposal to nail down a plum job.

Yes, Judy Muller, I imagine it would be hard to explain this to your students. But I think the more important lesson that you can teach them isn’t necessarily to rationalize, positively or negatively, Clinton’s hiring. Rather, it is to help them reconcile the tensions between the ideals and the realities of democratic life.

Note: I wrote this article on November 15th 2011 for an old Media & Tech blog.

Friday, November 15, 2013

Need for Deep Dialogue in "Schooling the World"








SCHOOLING THE WORLD: THE WHITE MAN'S LAST BURDEN [emphasis, added]
If you wanted to change an ancient culture in a generation, how would you do it? 
You would change the way it educates its children. 
The U.S. Government knew this in the 19th century when it forced Native American children into government boarding schools. Today, volunteers build schools in traditional societies around the world, convinced that school is the only way to a 'better' life for indigenous children. 
But is this true? What really happens when we replace a traditional culture's way of learning and understanding the world with our own? SCHOOLING THE WORLD takes a challenging, sometimes funny, ultimately deeply disturbing look at the effects of modern education on the world's last sustainable indigenous cultures. 
Beautifully shot on location in the Buddhist culture of Ladakh in the northern Indian Himalayas, the film weaves the voices of Ladakhi people through a conversation between four carefully chosen original thinkers; anthropologist and ethnobotanist Wade Davis, a National Geographic Explorer-in-Residence; Helena Norberg-Hodge and Vandana Shiva, both recipients of the Right Livelihood Award for their work with traditional peoples in India; and Manish Jain, a former architect of education programs with UNESCO, USAID, and the World Bank. 
The film examines the hidden assumption of cultural superiority behind education aid projects, which overtly aim to help children "escape" to a "better life" -- despite mounting evidence of the environmental, social, and mental health costs of our own modern consumer lifestyles, from epidemic rates of childhood depression and substance abuse to pollution and climate change. 
It looks at the failure of institutional education to deliver on its promise of a way out of poverty -- here in the United States as well as in the so-called "developing" world. 
And it questions our very definitions of wealth and poverty -- and of knowledge and ignorance -- as it uncovers the role of schools in the destruction of traditional sustainable agricultural and ecological knowledge, in the breakup of extended families and communities, and in the devaluation of elders and ancient spiritual traditions. 
Finally, SCHOOLING THE WORLD calls for a "deeper dialogue" between cultures, suggesting that we have at least as much to learn as we have to teach, and that these ancient sustainable societies may harbor knowledge which is vital for our own survival in the coming millennia.
I saw this film two years ago, while I was still in Dubai.  Simply on the face of it, it was thought-provoking.  At a deeper level, it was quite disturbing.  I didn't have the privilege of the summary above, and it captures well what was swirling in my head.

Religion, education or democracy, the West had a narrow, self-centered notion of what other regions and cultures needed.  Alternatively, it was the desire to exercise power and to satisfy greed that prompted the West to plunder (i.e., colonize) indigenous, mostly defenseless peoples - from Asia and the Middle East, to Africa and South America.

The organizers of this film showing did the right thing: We spent several minutes in the theater talking about the film, after viewing it.  They arranged further dialogue on it.

It's not to say that we, or anyone for that matter, ought not try to help indigenous cultures.  Rather, it's a matter of seeking to understand first, before being understood.  Certainly, before stepping and imposing something.

Thank you for reading, and let me know what you think!

Ron Villejo, PhD

Monday, November 4, 2013

Reflecting on Funny Media and Technology


(image credit)
Funny, how media and technology have seeped into our modern day parlance.  How nostalgic it may be to harken back to the good old days.

(image credit)
Of course, kids can bring their devices outside.  Even U-verse allows you to bring the TV to the backyard, and keep its wireless connection.  But we get your point, Will, and we agree.

(image credit)
You see, that's the thing:  With the advent of Google, I don't have to store a lot of stuff in my memory, personal and computer.  Google has a gaggle, or googol, of information that it can collate and present to him when I need it.  

(image credit)
This cartoon was framed as Microsoft Marketing Strategy.  In fact, this weekend, I was on a Hangout with a couple of guys while watching the Blackhawks-Jets game, and one of them did not want the Microsoft Surface (tablet) because of Windows.  I said, I was actually looking into it, as I liked the convenience of Office Suite, USB ports, and a keyboard.  Still, it made me see, at least in part, why Surface may be tanking in the market.  A company cannot keep putting out problematic operating systems, and expect the market to stay strong and loyal.

(image credit)
A couple of comments were not too kindly toward Google or Glass.  But I thought this was funny.

(image credit)



Well, I wasn't sure if this lady got my joke, and was just playing along, or if she believed that we could in fact 3D-print food.  

Thank you for reading, and let me know what you think!

Ron Villejo, PhD

Saturday, September 28, 2013

The Sublime and Ridiculous in Tech Humor





I traveled a lot, and wi-fi connection and electric socket were de rigueur at airports, hotels and cafes.  But these posts from the Funny Technology community on Google+ show us the sublime, the true, and the ridiculous of wi-fi.




You know how we position our laptop screens away from people?  There are a host of reasons, and musings, and vanities behind this.




Our computers are a repository for all things that can bog us down, get us in trouble, and otherwise make us pound our head on the table.

Thank you for reading, and let me know what you think!

Ron Villejo, PhD

Monday, September 16, 2013

The Artificial Line Between Online and Real Life


(image credit)
Andrew Couts takes a philosophical turn in The Digital Self: Our online lives are our ‘real’ lives, but his message has very real and practical import in our lives.

It was just four years ago that I trained my eyes forthrightly, and my fingertips actively, on social media.  In 2008, a friend added me on Facebook, but more than a year passed before I took the emerging juggernaut seriously.  I was determined, even as a neophyte, to participate and interact and also to observe and learn.  

To Couts' point, I realized back then that the distinction some of my friends made - online friends versus real friends - was a grossly artificial one.  One was no less real (or unreal) as the other.  In time, I said to them, they will just be friends.  

But Couts carries the point deeper:  that of a division in ourselves and what we do online versus real life (emphasis, added):
It’s difficult to say exactly when we began referring to “the Web” or “the Internet” as something other than “real life.” (I would guess it started at the very beginning.) But it’s clear we haven’t yet given up the practice. A quick search on the Internet’s record of steaming consciousness (a.k.a Twitter) shows that thousands of people still disassociate what happens online and offline. We have “Internet friends” and “real life friends.” We have interests that we only explore through the Web, and those we never include in any status updates. We can be one person offline, and someone else entirely on the Web.
We become victims or perpetrators of this false online-offline disconnect constantly – not just during national tragedies or manhunts. We bitch about our bosses on Facebook, thinking it will never come up in future job interviews. We create entirely separate identities, believing that our various selves will never cross paths. And we toss around horrific names in comment sections, forgetting that there are sensitive human beings on the receiving end.
You might argue that social media apps, like autobot replies, work automatically.  You might also point to those idiotic love or money spam messages, and think these cannot be real.  But there are absolutely persons behind these robotic replies and messages, and there are most certainly persons receiving these.

Enter:  Jimmy Kimmel.





The best comedy, I think, does two seemingly contradictory things all at once:  It makes us laugh, and it makes us sad.  This is a stroke of genius on Kimmel's part to humanize the people some of us tweet about and tweet with.  Those people who delivered these mean tweets can hide behind Twitter handles, as Couts points out, but in a way Kimmel has 'de-anonymized' them.  He moves new media (Twitter) into the tried-and-true old media of TV, which ironically many of us watch on new media (YouTube), and shows us how celebrities took these mean tweets.  Many of them were truly good sports about it, and took it in stride with calm confidence or fitting humor.

But some looked hurt, though.

So Kimmel dissolves that artificial boundary between online and real life, not fully of course but sufficiently enough, for us to think twice, I hope, about how we carry ourselves on social media.

Thank you for reading, and let me know what you think!

Ron Villejo, PhD

Friday, September 6, 2013

Yay or Nay on the New Yahoo! Logo?


(image credit)
From some reports, CEO Marissa Mayer comes across as a micro-manager.  She has certainly seeped herself into the old culture and practices at Yahoo!, and while the results may be mixed or delayed at best, there are increasing wins, marked as feathers in her cap, for example, Yahoo beats Google in traffic for first time since 2011.

Marissa Mayer, in Vogue
Mayer even managed to sidle into Vogue, where the already attractive top leader ratchets it up on the glamorous-sexy meter.

But we digress.  Back to the new Yahoo! logo, which the company switched on at midnight yesterday.
"Marissa was an integral collaborator and force in the process," says Kathy Savitt, chief marketing officer at Yahoo. 
That's putting it mildly, apparently. 
In a post on Yahoo's recently acquired Tumblr site titled "Geeking Out on the Logo," Mayer describes the process. 
"So, one weekend this summer, I rolled up my sleeves and dove into the trenches with our logo design team: Bob Stohrer, Marc DeBartolomeis, Russ Khaydarov, and our intern Max Ma. We spent the majority of Saturday and Sunday designing the logo from start to finish, and we had a ton of fun weighing every minute detail. We knew we wanted a logo that reflected Yahoo - whimsical, yet sophisticated. Modern and fresh, with a nod to our history. Having a human touch, personal. Proud." 
The geeky part kicks in with a "blueprint of what we did, calling out some of what was cool/mathematical." 
Writes Mayer: "Our last move was to tilt the exclamation point by 9 degrees, just to add a bit of whimsy."
That very much sounds like micro-managing, but, hey, she's the CEO and she's entitled to micro-manage however much she likes.  

(image credit)
Frankly, I like the old logo better.  The new one looks quite staid, and perhaps too proper for a company wanting to tap into the lucrative younger demographics.  The old one has the right amount of whimsy, coupled with cool design.

(image credit)

(image credit)

Something tells me that this may be like that Coca Cola snafu several years.  They toyed with a new formula, that didn't suit the taste of its consumers.  Let's see if Yahoo! reverts back to its old logo.

Thank you for reading, and let me know what you think!

Ron Villejo, PhD

Thursday, September 5, 2013

The Pathos of Apple in Tech Humor


If only it were as easy to tap into his genius as sliding the touch bar (image credit)

After iTV, after iWatch... (image credit)

Sometimes irony is the best form of humor (image credit)

Life's a bitch, and then you die.  You die, and then life's a bitch.  (image credit)

From evolution, to devolution (image credit)
Thank you for reading, and let me know what you think!

Ron Villejo, PhD

Tuesday, July 2, 2013

Evolution of my News Consumption


The way I consume news has evolved steadily in the past 10 - 15 years.  Print, TV and radio were my media:   I subscribed to the Chicago Tribune, Wall Street Journal (WSJ), and Sports Illustrated.  We made sure our cable package had CNN, as I enjoyed the wider and deeper coverage of news than that of local stations.  When I traveled abroad, BBC became a favorite to watch on TV.  Tooling around in the car, I had WBBM switched on.  As Twitter is to micro-blogging, WBBM radio is to micro-news.    

My travels as a management consultant picked up steam, and my news consumption became more of an online activity.  It was very gradual.  I learned that my WSJ subscription gave me full access to its online fare, so that's where I read it.  The other subscriptions fell by the wayside one by one.  Also, with better internet bandwidth at hotels, it was easier to watch news videos online.  Traveling meant airplanes, taxis and minivans, so I was hardly in my car anymore and thus had little opportunity to listen to the radio.

Two years ago, I decided not to renew my very last (paid) subscription - WSJ - and went with Google News as my home page when I launched my browser.

(image credit)
Then, at the beginning of this year, I found myself more active on Google+, and really enjoyed not just new circles of friends, but also new streams of news, quotes and photos.  Soon thereafter, I switched my home page to Google+.  With LinkedIn and Twitter already serving as news feed for me, my news consumption is now driven mostly by social media.

The irony?  I still read the Tribune, WSJ and Sports Illustrated, plus scores of other publications of interest to me, because they have pages on Google+, Twitter, and-or Facebook.

In the aftermath of the Boston Marathon bombings and amidst Hurricane Sandy devastations, CNN coverage on TV was compelling and heartbreaking.  But it soon became monotonous for me.  It was repetitive, even obsessive.  Information comes in increments, so clarity about an event happens in a discontinuous manner, that is, when news breaks.  In the meantime, reporters and newscasters resort to half-baked babble.

What I didn't like
  • The lack of control over the programming and timing of what I was watching
  • The lack of choice over commercial ads, except of course to switch channels or switch the TV off entirely
  • The limited perspectives taken by the news editors, mainly overlooking those of international or contrary views
I imagine that these news stations have to accommodate what may be the 'Short Head' of their audience, that is, what the majority of their viewers are interested in.  The 'Long Tail' is where the rest of the audience is, and this is the purview of the internet.

Where someone like me has far wider control, further reach, and greater options.  

Thank you for reading, and let me know what you think!

Ron Villejo, PhD

Monday, March 19, 2012

The Tripartite Model and STEM


A former general manager once called me a dilettante. He was a smart man, who had a way with words, and this was veiled but unmistakable hostility. He meant that I pursued and dabbled in different subjects, which, to him, indicated lack of serious focus.

I can admire men and women, in all fields of endeavor, dedicating their lives to a particular profession, research or art. They take a vertical approach that plunges them deeply into a subject, and they earn the right, over time, to be called experts in that area.

While there is truth to anyone describing my tact as horizontal, in contrast, it isn’t entirely true.

You see, I’m creating a Tripartite Model that forthrightly positions science, art and religion as a complete epistemology. This being a better way for us to grasp things about ourselves, our world, and our universe. This effort requires that I go both horizontally and vertically.

I graduated with a BA in psychology and a PhD in clinical psychology. I don’t mind describing myself as a psychologist, but more accurately I position myself best as a thinker. Over the past two years, for example, I’ve poured over Albert Einstein (physicist) and John Nash (mathematician); written scores of poetry, while schooling myself in the work of master painters like Caravaggio, Rembrandt, Rothko and Picasso; and learned as much as I could about Islam from Muslim friends. All far afield, in the eyes of my colleagues, from psychology.

But why not?

I have always held to the belief on life as being infinitely interesting. That there are so many intriguing things to explore, discover and grasp. Many of which, in the wide-eyed world of media and technology, are free and accessible literally at our fingertips.

So why not?

Kareem Abdul Jabbar (image credit)
Basketball legend, Kareem Abdul Jabbar, spoke recently to high school students and their parents in Chicago, and I can only underscore what he encouraged and advised. That they may very well pursue their love in sports and entertainment.  But for goodness sake, explore other subjects, too. Especially those as critical to our day and age as STEM:  science, technology, engineering and mathematics.

Because only through such exploration, which is horizontal, can they know their potential and realize it. Well said, Kareem.

Thank you for reading, and let me know what you think!

Ron Villejo, PhD

Thursday, February 16, 2012

Spotlight on Bill Clinton


(image credit)
The date was September 16th 1998. It was before the much heralded decade of iWhatevers and Facebook, Twitter and YouTube. It was also the day Karen and I welcomed our daughter, Eva, to our world. We saved the Chicago Tribune as a memento of that day. Two copies, in fact.

The thing was, that time was when then-US President Bill Clinton was in a political and personal row over White House intern Monica Lewinsky. That sex scandal and impeachment efforts dominated the front page of the Tribune (sigh). What were we welcoming our daughter to?

Our news consumption was mainly through traditional media: print, TV and radio. It was on TV, for example, that we heard Clinton deny having any sexual relations with ‘that woman’ and insisting on privacy for his family. It was in the Tribune, also, that we read about florid details of the very things he denied. What privacy he called for, he himself indelibly breached with his shenanigans. He was the butt of jokes on radio talk shows, deservedly so.

Now I hardly ever pick up a (print) newspaper anymore.  Instead, it’s Google News where I find out that Lewinsky is back in the spotlight, in a title crafted deliberately by the Los Angeles Times to draw clicks to its article and pages.  It is about a documentary on Clinton, and I watch the trailer on YouTube.


Here’s the lengthy description of the documentary, accompanying this trailer. So, you see, the Los Angeles Times’ trite ploy notwithstanding, Lewinsky occupies only a bit part of the spotlight. Thankfully.
Coming to PBS beginning Monday, Feb. 20. From draft dodging to the Dayton Accords, from Monica Lewinsky to a balanced budget, the presidency of William Jefferson Clinton veered between sordid scandal and grand achievement. In CLINTON, the latest installment in the critically acclaimed and successful series of presidential biographies, AMERICAN EXPERIENCE explores the fascinating story of an American president who rose from a broken childhood in Arkansas to become one of the most successful politicians in modern American history and one of the most complex and conflicted characters to ever stride across the public stage. It recounts a career full of accomplishment and rife with scandal, a marriage that would make history and create controversy and a presidency that would define the crucial and transformative period between the fall of the Berlin Wall and 9/11. It follows Clinton across his two terms as he confronted some of the key forces that would shape the future, including partisan political warfare and domestic and international terrorism, and struggled, with uneven success, to define the role of American power in a post-Cold War world. Most memorably, it explores how Clinton’s conflicted character made history, even as it enraged his enemies and confounded his friends. The program features unprecedented access to scores of Clinton insiders including White House Press Secretary Dee Dee Myers, White House Counsel Bernard Nussbaum, White House Chief of Staff Leon Panetta and Deputy Chief of Staff Harold Ickes, as well as interviews with foreign leaders, members of the Republican opposition, childhood friends, staffers from Clinton’s years as governor of Arkansas, biographers and journalists.
Our daughter is 13 years old now, and our world has been radically changed in her young lifetime. Clinton is quite the elder statesman now, is apparently in high demand for keynote speeches, and travels globally for his philanthropy.  Maybe for ongoing philandering, too.  (Apologies, I couldn't resist the pun.)

Eva is very much a child of the golden decade of media and technology. But it’s no small irony, I suppose, that this documentary, so parsimoniously titled ‘Clinton,’ will be aired on traditional (PBS) TV. I will have to unplug, and watch it on plain old traditional media!

Thank your for reading, and let me know what you think!

Ron Villejo, PhD

Saturday, January 28, 2012

Oprah, Uncovered


This article is from Eva, my daughter, who wrote it for a biography project at school.  Her subject is arguably the most recognizable face in media.

(image credit)
Introduction

To many people across the nation, Oprah Gail Winfrey would be considered one of greatest entertainment executives ever. She has had to sacrifice many things for fame, but eventually reached her dreams. Oprah is one of the world’s most well known talk show hosts, has launched her own production company named Harpo (Oprah spelled backwards) and has also received numerous awards including a Daytime Emmy Award in 1987. Because Winfrey was sexually abused as a child, she initiated a campaign to create a national database of convicted child abusers. She is the current owner of her restaurant called “Eccentric” (Krohn, 2009). In 1993, Bill Clinton signed “Oprah’s Bill” confirming that a national child abusers database would be established (Unknown, 2011).

Although Oprah is an extremely talented speaker and role model to young women around the world, it was not what one would call and “easy rise to fame” for her. She started speaking when she was just three years old, and her Grandmother, Hattie Mae greatly defined her style of talking to audiences. As she became older, she looked at women such as Barbara Walters and Maya Angelou for inspiration. Once Winfrey started publically speaking, people realized her incredible talent and tried to help her more fully develop it. She worked as a news anchor on WJZ- TV and was also accepted to Tennessee State University where she studied drama and speech.

Oprah has had to overcome many obstacles along the way, but has managed to maintain her fame with modesty. She is still world- wide known and owns a thriving production company along with many other attributes. Her fame has influenced many women around the world and has proved that race or gender does not determine success. In 2007, Winfrey opened an all girls school called the Oprah Winfrey Leadership Academy which helped further develop young women’s abilities and enrich their education. She is an influential figure and fearless when it comes to helping others.

Her Childhood

Add caption
Oprah Gail Winfrey was born to Vernita Lee and Vernon Winfrey on January 29, 1954 in the small country town of Kosciusko, Mississippi. When she was just a baby, her mother decided to find work for herself and moved to Milwaukee, Wisconsin. She left little Oprah in the care of her strict, but caring grandmother, Hattie Mae. At a very young age, Winfrey was expected to do chores around the house and farm. Every Sunday she went to church with her grandmother and started reciting passages from the Bible. It was with Hattie Mae that she discovered her passion for speaking. As she recited the passages, people at the church she attended began to notice her. Her grandmother decided to send her to a kindergarten center in Buffalo, Mississippi, but Oprah became bored there.

In 1960, Hattie Mae became ill, so Oprah was sent to live with her mother in Milwaukee. As she adjusted to her new life, she especially disliked the noise and bustle of the busy city. In her new home, her mom discouraged Oprah’s reading abilities. Vernita eventually decided that it would be better for her daughter to live with her father, Vernon, in Nashville, Tennessee. She went to live with her father and step mother, Zelma, in 1962. Her parents were very strict, but loved Oprah very much and encouraged her growth of learning. She felt very at home with Vernon and Zelma, and was still academically advanced in school.

During the summer of 1963, Winfrey went to visit her mother back in Milwaukee. She decided to move back in with Vernita, and tried as much as she could to impress her. However, Oprah did not receive as much attention as she did from Vernon, so she turned to watching T.V. to keep herself occupied. Shows such as Leave it to Beaver and I Love Lucy sparked an interest in Oprah because she enjoyed watching television shows about families. One night while Vernita went to work, she left her children in the care of her 19 year- old nephew. Her cousin proceeded to rape nine- year old Oprah, but afterwards took her to get ice cream and coaxed her not to tell anyone about the encounter. She felt terrified, confused, and helpless against the assaults. Winfrey thought that if she were to confess the truth to anyone, they would not believe her. As she became a teenager, she became very wild and reckless. Oprah skipped school, dated many boys, stole money from her mother’s purse, and even ran away from home.

(image credit)
Vernita’s patience with her began to wear thin, so she called a teen detention home. The detention home reported to be full, so she sent her back to Nashville to live with her father. Oprah’s parents missed her greatly, but disliked her new rebellious behavior. Vernon knew that it was his duty as a parent to steer her back on track. Little did he know, his daughter was already seven months pregnant with a child when she arrived. She wore baggy clothes to try to conceal her pregnancy and avoided telling her parents. However, she knew that she could not hide it for much longer, so she confessed to her dad. Oprah had been so stressed that she gave birth to her baby two months earlier than expected. Her baby died within the first two weeks of his life, and she tried to look as this as a lesson. Winfrey’s grades were also lowering to a C, but her father pushed her harder. Oprah ran for vice president at her new high school and won a speech contest, as well. A station named WVOL asked her if she would like to represent them in the Miss Fire Prevention Beauty Pageant. Her honest attitude and confident personality stunned the judges, and she won the contest. Later on, she also accepted a job at a radio station called WVOL as a part time news reader. Oprah was accepted to Tennessee State University where she studied speech and drama (Krohn, 2009).

Her Adult Life

In college, Oprah Winfrey continued to study hard, but also kept up with her part time job at WVOL where she was gaining real-life experience. In 1973, she received an offer from a station called WTVF-TV which was a CBS television station in Nashville. At first, she tried to turn down the offer, but eventually decided to audition for the job. During the audition, she was not sure how she was supposed to act. She imagined that she should act like Barbara Walters when she spoke. Winfrey landed the job, and became the first black newscaster in Nashville. After gaining some professional experience from this job, she began to look for new work in 1976.

She received a great offer from a news station called WJZ-TV in Baltimore, Maryland. Oprah took the job, and was thrilled at starting out her new career with the station. However, the people of Baltimore were not particularly in favor of her warm, friendly, and down- to- earth reading style. They also disliked her speaking voice, and resided in sending her to a speech coach. In 1987, a new station manager was hired at WJZ- TV, and he wanted Oprah to co-host a new morning show called People are Talking.

Winfrey continued to host the show for six more years, but then came across another huge opportunity for a job at WLS- TV in Chicago, Illinois. In 1984, she recorded her audition tape, and the station loved it. She became a host for the popular talk show called A.M. Chicago. The people enjoyed her personality and openness so much, that in 1985, the station decided to rename the show and call it the Oprah Winfrey Show. The same year, a film producer and musician named Quincy Jones consulted Oprah to play the role of Sofia in the movie, the Color Purple. In 1986, she was even nominated for an Academy Award. Throughout her whole career, she found comfort in relieving her stress by eating food. She gained weight and felt very over worked. She did not win the award, but tried to look at the situation lightly. Because her show was thriving, she signed a deal with King World Productions which bought the national syndication rights. This meant that her show could be broadcasted to nations all over the world (Krohn, 2009).

Stedman Graham and Oprah Winfrey (image credit)
The new deal with King World Productions increased her salary, so she decided to start her own production company called Harpo (Oprah spelled backwards). She became the first woman in history to own her own talk show (Unknown, 2011). In 1987, she met a man named Stedman Graham who was a former model and basketball player. He worked for a program called Athlete’s Against Drugs (Krohn, 2009). Winfrey also started a campaign in 1990 to create a national database of convicted child abusers because of her childhood abuse. President Bill Clinton signed the National Child Protection Act, better known as “Oprah’s Bill” in 1993. In 1998, she stared in a movie called Beloved as a courageous African American woman named Sethe (Unknown, 2011).

In 2007, she opened an all girl’s school in South Africa called the Oprah Winfrey Leadership Academy for girls who show exceptional leadership qualities and are interested in excelling (Krohn, 2009). In 2008, she publically endorsed President Barack Obama and his campaign for presidential election (Unknown, 2011). She currently lives in her home in Montecito, California. Also in 2008, she created her own television network called the Oprah Winfrey Network (OWN). She reportedly is still with her boyfriend, Stedman Graham, but the two have not to gotten married nor had children yet (Krohn, 2009).

Oprah Winfrey Leadership Academy

(image credit)
Oprah Winfrey opened an all girls school located in South Africa called the Oprah Winfrey Leadership Academy She explained in an interview that every child deserves a good education, but her school is designed for girls who show great potential and are daring to excel and develop their education. To attend the school, a young woman must be personally invited. The academy provides a curriculum that teaches girls language arts, math, natural science, social studies, arts/ culture, life orientation, economic management sciences, and technology. The students are also taught the dialects of English, Isi Zulu, Sesotho, and Afrikaans.

This is a great accomplishment on Oprah’s behalf because it provides the girls that show exceptional leadership potential with a great education and helps them further develop their learning abilities. This act has also inspired many women across the globe to pursue their dreams and work hard. It is very important that the children who are below poverty receive an education, but it is also vital that the children who show great potential be nurtured and taught. Oprah is a strong and determined woman, and took the initiative of providing advanced girls with a enhancing learning structure (Unknown, 2011).

A Role Model for Everyone

(image credit)
Oprah Winfrey owns her own production company called Harpo. She worked as the host of her own talk show called The Oprah Winfrey Show for 25 years, and currently owns a television network called the Oprah Winfrey Network (OWN). In 2007, she opened an all girls school called the Oprah Winfrey Leadership Academy in South Africa for girls with outstanding leadership qualities. She has also made many generous donations to Morehouse College, the Harold Washington Library, the United Negro Fund, and Tennessee State University. In 1990- 1993, she promoted a bill about national child protection. In 2000, she issued her own magazine called “O” (Unknown, 2011).

Her great achievements and caring personality will inspire women all around the world to succeed and give their best effort. Oprah is an inspiration to black women especially because she has accomplished a great deal and always seeks to help others. She has impacted the lives of others by being herself on her talk shows and open. Winfrey’s deep and personal questions form a connection to her viewers at home. Overall she is a great woman with a strong personality that will help both men and women pursue their dreams.

Thank you for reading, and let Eva and me know what you think!

Ron Villejo, PhD