Monday, March 17, 2014

Commentary is on Us


(image credit)
My article from an old Media & Tech blog (August 21st 2011)

Thankfully there are reasonable viewpoints about the rioting afflicting the UK and US.
The answer is not to limit access to social media or even to sacrifice what little privacy we may have left using them, but rather to educate ourselves and our children about the underlying biases of these technologies: how they influence the way we think and act. [Douglas Rushkoff]
Reference: Cutting social media no answer to flash mobs.

Social media is now very much a part of our reality. So like it or not, we must acknowledge both its uses and misuses. We don’t have to be active on Facebook, Twitter, or BlackBerry Messenger. We don’t even have to be members of any of these. But I believe we have a responsibility to understand how these things work. The recent spate of violence makes this responsibility even more of an imperative, for those of us who are authorities, teachers and parents. Educate ourselves, and we can educate, guide and support others.
"Social networking is not the issue,” Police Commissioner Charles Ramsey said last week during a Philly.com online chat. “It’s how people are misusing it in order to gather and then commit a crime.”

In the heat of anything that heightens emotion, like fear, anger or sadness, we as human beings are prone to think in black-or-white terms and to react or speak in ways we might otherwise regret. Calls by some people to shut down social media is an example of this, and is frankly foolish to try to do. The Constitution protects freedom of speech, so the US is unlikely to devolve into a communications censor-happy country like China. What’s more, we human beings are adaptable and resourceful. Shut our typical means of communicating or connecting, and we will find alternative ways of doing so.

Along these same lines, some comments by readers on CNN.com are just as reactionary:
The police should just open fire on them. They are stupid, so they will either learn quickly, or exit the gene pool. 
One deterent would be for the store owner or cashier to shoot as many of them as possible. 
Pity the owner didn’t have a weapon with a large clip, and a short look on life because of a fatal illness.
All of this is terrible! 

Authorities and citizens alike must do whatever proper thing they can to stop criminal activity. No question about this. At the same time, we need to pause and step back, and check our emotions, perceptions and reactions. It is more critical at times like these to think reasonably, speak thoughtfully, and act responsibly. In truth, stopping this rioting is a difficult, complicated effort. But with greater calm and reason, we are not only in a better position to stop it but also to grasp its root causes.
The less access we have to these tools, however, the less about them we understand. And the less about them we understand, the more easily our behavior can be programmed by them, instead of the other way around. [Douglas Rushkoff]
Most folks (white, black, Hispanic, Asian, etc.) are just looking for level-headed folks that will be fair and report the facts and do what they can do to better society. [CNN reader]
Without resorting to the extreme, what do you think is the best way to grasp and deal with this rioting?

Thank you for reading, and let me know what you think!

Ron Villejo, PhD

Friday, March 14, 2014

Ben Huh on Risks and Memes


The founder and CEO of Cheezburger speaks to us about how he moved past failure and lessons he learned.
Any business, new or otherwise, must work within its available and-or accessible resources.  In this respect, Ben Huh has key lessons learned to share, for example, on the notion of risk.  Entrepreneurs are not so much risk takers, as they are risk managers: We love opportunity, but we hate risk.  In this regard, making smaller bets and making good mistakes are crucial.  What constitutes a good mistake?  One that is not so hefty as to collapse a business, and one that we can learn effectively from.

Even though memes have been around for quite some time, not everyone knows exactly what these viral sensations entail. As they continue to rage on, the king of the meme, Cheezburger founder Ben Huh, gives us the lowdown on this phenomenon.
Rage Comics, Advice Dog, planking, Fail, and LOLCats are all examples of the new collaboration (rf. Clay Shirky on Collaboration, Abundance and Aims).

Thank you for reading, and let me know what you think!

Ron Villejo, PhD

Wednesday, March 12, 2014

Eric Schmidt on Tech Titans and American Security


Some of the biggest names in tech [were] in Santa Monica, California [last] week, at Oasis: The Montgomery Summit. On that list [was] Google Executive Chairman Eric Schmidt. Here, he [discussed] the most powerful forces in tech with Bloomberg West anchor Emily Chang and Google Idea's Jared Cohen.
Amazon, Apple, Facebook, Google.  Different customer philosophy, business models.


Google Executive Chairman Eric Schmidt and Google Ideas Director Jared Cohen discuss the company's relationship with the NSA and privacy concerns Oasis: The Montgomery Summit in Santa Monica, California.
I imagine Google has classified relationships with US government, perhaps the NSA included, which Schmidt will not reveal in a million years.  I imagine, moreover, that Google is among tech titans advising the NSA how to better protect Americans via Big Data and analytics.  Finally, I imagine that Google work assiduously to keep control over the gargantuan data it has already collected on all of us via wide-ranging product offering.

Thank you for reading, and let me know what you think!

Ron Villejo, PhD

Monday, March 10, 2014

Some Low Down on High Tech Billionaires



Technology isn't the only royal road to riches.  It's quite diversified, as far as that goes.  But technology is certainly well-represented.  So keep working at The Next Big Thing.

Reference: Forbes Billionaires: Full List Of The Richest Americans.


From pee and mayonnaise, to U2 and Frasier, Forbes has what you need on the world's richest to take to your next geek shindig.  


There's something about islands and yachting for the wealthy oracle.


I loved to read books, and I bought them regularly through mail-in book clubs and at the bookstores.  Now I very much still love to read, but I hardly buy any books.  My reading fare is virtually all online.  Which makes Amazon all the more amazing, as it's morphed from books to a wide array of stuff it sells online.


Baseball cards, garbage bags, stamps and coins.  The positively reserved, demure (NOT) Mavericks owner has sold it all.  His net worth is a paltry $2.6 billion.  

Thank you for reading, and let me know what you think!

Ron Villejo, PhD

Friday, March 7, 2014

A Question of Judgment and Learning at Yahoo!


Kathy Savitt and Marissa Mayer
As Ms. Savitt works to rebuild Yahoo's image, she also hopes to turn around her own career following the failure of her social commerce startup, Lockerz Inc. The Seattle company, which rewarded visitors with iPads and other freebies in exchange for watching ads, burned through more than $50 million in venture capital funding over three years as it struggled to attract users and advertisers. Ms. Savitt left for Yahoo in September 2012, and last month Lockerz was sold to Chinese e-commerce player Light In The Box Ltd. for a fraction of the money investors put in, rendering the shares held by most employees and early backers worthless. 
Through Yahoo and her recent friendship with Ms. Mayer, Ms. Savitt has a second chance to accomplish what she failed to do with Lockerz: Build a cool online brand with youth appeal.

I do not begrudge Savitt her second chance, and no one ought to, either.  But there are a few things from this Wall Street Journal report that is concerning about her rise at Yahoo! 

How well is Mayer actually able to spot talent and to make the right decision vis-à-vis the talent Yahoo! needs?  

The fiasco with Henrique de Castro may not quite be resolved, if she didn't tease out crucial lessons learned and honed-in on skills gaps in her leadership repertoire.  The fact that she elevated a friend, however, suggests that her judgment may still be compromised.        

How much does Savitt understand the crucial factors for her previous successes and failures?  

It's a parallel learning and development effort to that of Mayer.  She clearly succeeded at forging relationships and climbing the corporate ladder. But she may, or may not, have the stuff required to help turn around Yahoo!  Also, I hope that there is a saving grace to her departure from Lockerz, but from the sounds of the Wall Street Journal report, she was the captain who jumped her sinking ship first.  So besides competency, there is a question of character squarely on her.

Thank you for reading, and let me know what you think!

Ron Villejo, PhD

Wednesday, March 5, 2014

Importance of Culture for Facebook and WhatsApp


(image credit)
Facebook CEO, Mark Zuckerberg posted, “WhatsApp will continue to operate independently within Facebook. The product roadmap will remain unchanged and the team is going to stay in Mountain View. Over the next few years, we're going to work hard to help WhatsApp grow and connect the whole world.”

And in a post to its users, WhatsApp wrote: “Here’s what will change for you, our users: nothing.”
Reference: With $19 Billion, Does WhatsApp Really Care About Culture?

I offered a lengthy comment:

This Facebook-WhatsApp deal may be an M&A, without the M. If in fact we can go by Mark Zuckerberg's public reassurances, then that culture clash - and that high M&A failure rate, in particular - may not be much of an issue. At least for the time being. As some comments here point out, Facebook is mainly interested in growing the user base for WhatsApp. Zuckerberg sees this platform as having one of the best potential for reaching the one-billion user mark. With loads of cash on hand, plus Facebook's India-like population size, WhatsApp should have every confidence about reaching that target.

That said, I'd argue that culture will be an issue in one form or other. (a) As much as Zuckerberg says that WhatsApp will continue to operate independently, there is also talk about including voice in the messaging system. (b) As much as he says that monetizing the platform is not a major concern over the next five years, we can all imagine that the senior leadership teams on both sides will be heavily engaged on this issue. It took Google a few years to figure out how to monetize YouTube, and they're well on their way on this effort, as we all know. So how well will leadership and staff on either side work with one another, in view of such change and collaboration? The answer is inviolably cultural in nature. (c) What's more, we cannot ignore the broader culture of WhatsApp users. There are all sorts of sentiments regarding Facebook, to begin with, that we can expect this deal to have some impact on that culture. How exactly, that remains to be seen.

So I'd very much agree with you, Gary, Zuckerberg & Co. must've cared immensely about the WhatsApp culture. So did the leadership team of the latter, I'm sure.

Finally, my takeaway from these Korn/Ferry findings is this: I consulted for PDI years ago, and have found, and still find, these four leadership areas to be the most enduring and applicable across companies, industries and regions. But there may be too much variability in successful leadership profiles to pin down specific competencies as predictors of post-M&A success. At the same time, I'd be curious if you did a regression analysis of the data and which competencies accounted for the most variance in post-M&A success. I'm also curious about why Personal Leadership doesn't seem to be a significant predictor.


Thank you for reading, and let me know what you think!

Ron Villejo, PhD

Monday, March 3, 2014

Capturing Data on the World


We're all familiar with satellite imagery, but what we might now know is that much of it is out of date. That's because satellites are big and expensive, so there aren't that many of them up in space. As he explains in this fascinating talk, Dan Berkenstock and his team came up with a different solution, designing a cheap, lightweight satellite with a radically new approach to photographing what's going on on Earth.
In 10 minutes, we get an informative walk-through of a very innovative process. But I wonder...

Dan Berkenstock
Dan Berkenstock
I wonder why we even have to put anything in outer space to capture data on the world... 

What if we found a better compromise solution, say, something between (a) the clunky, laborious imaging technology of Google Street View and (b) the lightweight satellites, devised by Berkenstock and his team? 

(image credit)
... using drones, with the best-resolution cameras?

(image credit)
To me, the issue is less the hardware, and more the systems and algorithms to cobble all the imaging data we collect on the world.

Thank you for reading, and let me know what you think!

Ron Villejo, PhD